Sunday, October 08, 2017

About those limited police resources.....


Previous:


Moeen Ali: Israel-hating cricket idol and his close to links to radical Islamists

Moeen Ali wearing his "Free Palestine" (i.e. death to Israel) wristband
In 2014 a Hamas cell kidnapped and murdered three Israeli kids and then launched a missile war against Israeli civilians after Israel had the audacity to hunt down the terrorist cell involved in the murders. One of the many celebrities who came out in support of Hamas during that war was the England cricketer Moeen Ali. Defying ICC regulations, which should have seen him suspended or even sacked, he wore a "Free Palestine" wristband during an England test match. Now a  comprehensive article by Ruddy Darter shows that Moeen Ali has close links to radical Islamists who preach hatred of Jews and gays. Nice to know that he is a role model for all British Muslims


See also

Saturday, October 07, 2017

Thousands silently protest terrorism in London: media either ignores them or calls them 'right-wing extremists'

Thousands march in central London today to silently protest against terrorism

This is Britain today. Thousands of ordinary people - under the umbrella of the grass roots 'Football Fans Alliance'-  marching in silence against terrorism and extremism are labelled 'right-wing extremists' by the main stream media  and the entire political class (UPDATE: see screenshot of BBC News website below). Why? Because they are mainly white working class and they are concerned about Islamic terrorism. These people have been completely disenfranchised from the political process.

Update: Police confirm there were 30,000 in the march, but still silence from the media.

By coincidence exactly 10 years ago today a very different set of demonstrators marched through the same streets of London - but calling for the destruction of Israel and death to Jews.











Friday, October 06, 2017

The increasingly desperate and ludicrous Board of Deputies

The Board of Deputies is trying to justify its existence with this new video:


It starts OK with its focus on the increasing antisemitism in the UK (and - for a change - it even mentions left-wing antisemitism) although, of course, it ignores the main source (Islamists). But it then degenerates into a desperate and laughable 'explanation' of what the BoD actually does.

The only two concrete examples they cite of BoD successful action are
  1. Getting an unnamed MP (they are referring to Naz Shah) to 'apologize' for her antisemitism;
  2. Getting Amazon to stop selling holocaust denial books.
Well it turns out that, even after her apology, Naz Shah has continued with her anti-Israel activities,  while Amazon is still selling dozens of Holocaust denial books. Oh and you can also get Mein Kampf and the Protocols of Elders of Zion on Amazon - I just checked. 

The other two things the video tells us that the BoD does is:
  1. "Talk to people in power" (this supports their ages old claim that they do all their key work in the background, arguing - without any evidence whatsoever - that this is much better than raising concerns publicly; they disapprove of any activist work not under their control).
  2. Pander to Islam as a main priority. There is, of course, no explanation as to why Islam takes precedence over other groups such as Sikhs, Hindus, Buddhists, etc.

(As if to prove just how ineffective they are, at time of writing the video has 3 "thumbs up" and 10 "thumbs down" and of the 6 comments, 5 are from antisemites). 

So it seems this summary from a couple of years ago is still relevant:




See also:
Board of Deputies

Wednesday, September 27, 2017

Labour and antisemitism: you couldn't make this up

About that 'award' given to the Jewish Labour Movement .....

The Jewish Chronicle reports on this. What the JC don't tell you much about of course is who Del Singh really was. I blogged about Del Singh when he was killed in 2014. The Jewish Labour Movement must have known about him. So why did they accept the award in his name in the first place?
Del Singh: friend of Islamic terrorists in Gaza - killed by Islamic terrorists in Kabul
It is also important to note that the Palestine Solidarity Campaign - of which Singh was a prominent member - is not just an anti-Israel organisation but also a blatantly antisemitic one as proved by David Collier

See:

Understanding the Labour Party on antisemitism (part 2)

Following my earlier post, this summarises what the key Labour party members are now saying:


Tuesday, September 26, 2017

Another terrorist attack - another example of Palestinian privilege

A Palestinian terrorist murdered three Israelis today. Despite the fact that one of those murdered was an Arab-Israeli security guard, this sparked the usual celebrations throughout the Palestinian territories - celebrations which constitute yet another rule of Palestinian privilege:


Happy Palestinians hand out candy to celebrate murder of Israelis today
Fatah, PA praise terrorist in poster today

These are the victims whose murder is being celebrated:


and, to dispel the myth about 'poverty' driving terrorism here (apparently) is the house of the terrorist (several times the size of an average Israeli family apartment) :


 And here are some of the other relevant rules relating to today's attack:




See the full series of Palestinian privilege

Monday, September 25, 2017

Understanding the Labour Party policy on antisemitism

Following the first day of today's Labour Party conference their policy on antisemitism can easily be summarised:


Today's events included:
  • calls to expel the 'Jewish Labour Movement' from the party (for refusing to accept that Israel was 'like the Nazis') 
  • Jewish writer David Collier banned from attending a meeting of the new Jewish labour group JVL (a group that seeks the destruction of Israel) for being too Jewish for them
  • multiple instances of antisemitism dressed up as 'anti-Zionism', with the worst proponents stating there was no such thing as antisemitism in the party

Friday, September 15, 2017

On Battle of Britain Day: if German blitz on London were reported like Islamic terror attacks

Today is Battle of Britain day. With another terrorist attack in London today and the standard mainstream media and political response it is worth considering this ......



See also

Sunday, September 10, 2017

9/11 Revisited

On the anniversary of 9/11:



And this is how the attacks would have been reported based on how Islamic attacks are reported now....




And here is an edited version of a previous full article on this:


11 September 2001
Arabs massacred by Americans in day of tit-for-tat violence
The cycle of violence in America spiralled out of control today when a series of violent incidents left thousands dead, including many Arab and Muslim civilians. UN sources and Al Jazeera have confirmed that many of the Arabs killed were refugee children who had fled from oppression. American claims that they too suffered “many civilian deaths” have been strongly denied by the UN-affiliated relief workers in the Al Qaeda organisation who maintain that the only Americans killed were military personnel and illegal settlers.
The violence started when one of five unarmed Arab civilians, who boarded a 767 aircraft in Boston, was refused permission to fly the plane, despite having a valid flying licence. The American authorities have been imposing increasingly tight restrictions on the freedom of movement of Arab civilians within the US. This humiliation to their dignity has created, not unsurprisingly, deep anger and resentment among Muslims in the US. When the fully qualified pilot was denied the opportunity to work in his chosen profession, he became understandably angry. The outnumbered Arab men were then attacked by members of the crew, but what really happened next may never be known. What is certain is that all of the five Arab civilians were killed, along with the plane’s other occupants (primarily military and intelligence personnel along with some illegal American settlers) when the plane crashed into the North tower of the World Trade Center. Al Jaziera and the UN confirmed that the building (which housed a mosque) contained many Arab refugee children, who were all killed in the attack along with a number of Muslim workers. Some illegal American settlers dressed as businessmen may also have perished.
As news of the Muslim civilian deaths became known, it is believed that Arabs on another aircraft reacted with understandable passion, battling with military and security personnel. This plane soon crashed into the south tower of the Word Trade Center. After this second crash the US military ordered an unprecedented grounding of all civilian flights over US airspace, thus denying all Muslims living in the US the right to travel. On hearing news of this racist attack on their human rights and livelihood, a group of Arab militants on another airplane mounted a daring tit-for-tat strike. With nothing else to lose, and in sheer desperation, the militants crashed the plane they were travelling in into the very heart of the brutal US military machine – the Pentagon killing scores of soldiers.
In an escalation of the violence - and without any United Nations mandate  - the US military responded by threatening to shoot down any airplane still flying that was piloted by Arab Muslims. This brutal, illegal and racist measure led to the final, and most outrageous act of violence of the day, committed by a group of self-styled American settler vigilantes aboard flight 93 to San Francisco. On learning that their airplane was being flown by an Arab pilot, the American settlers took it upon themselves to massacre all the Muslim Arabs on board. In the ensuing struggle the Arab pilot was savagely killed and the plane crashed into a field, killing all the occupants, many of whom were Muslim refugee children. The US military is likely to have to accept full responsibility for the final massacre, since they had given messages to the settler passengers on board flight 93 that the Arab pilots were planning to crash the plane into the White House, even though no proof of such a wild conspiracy had been presented to the United Nations. The French and German leaders have already demanded a UN enquiry into the massacre of Arab civilians.
It is expected that any UN enquiry will also determine the cause of the complete collapse of both of the twin towers. Early evidence provided by reliable sources from the Palestinian Authority, The Syrian Government, the New York Times and Liberal Arts Professor Ward Churchill suggests that this must have been a joint operation between the CIA and the Israeli Mossad.

See also: